Can IRS Cure Defective Summons With Second Summons?

Can IRS Cure Defective Summons With Second Summons?

The administrative summons is one of the IRS’s primary tools for obtaining information from taxpayers and third parties. There are very few requirements that the IRS has to satisfy in issuing summones. In Maxcrest Limited v. United States, Case No. 15-mc-80270-JST, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California addressed whether the IRS can fix a defective summons by issuing a second summons.

The facts and procedural history are as follows:

  • The Russian Federation made an “exchange of information request” to the United States regarding the tax liabilities of NefteGasIndustriya-Invest (“NGI”) pursuant to the U.S.-Russia Tax Treaty.
  • Russia was seeking information about Platten Overseas (“Platten”), which was previously owed by Maxcredst.
  • The IRS issued two third-party summonses directed to Google Inc. (“Google”) regarding the email account information of Platten.
  • Maxcrest filed a petition to quash the IRS summones.
  • The IRS withdrew the first summons after Maxcrest filed a petition requesting that this Court quash the first summons due to procedural violations.
  • Maxcrest then sought discovery to pursue its claim that the Government acted in bad faith in issuing the first summons.
  • The IRS then issued a second similar summons on Platten which was issued without the procedural defects of the first summons.
  • The court dismissed Maxcrest’s petition to quash based on the second summons.
  • Maxcrest appealed, arguing that an improper purpose for the first summons tainted the second summons.

The issue before the court was whether a taxpayer may rely on allegations of bad faith related to an earlier withdrawn summons to establish that the IRS acted in bad faith with respect to a second, reissued summons.

Defects with the IRS’s First Summons

Maxcrest pointed out the following acts of bad faith by the government with respect to the first summons:

  1. When giving Platten notice of the first summons, the IRS did not include the statutorily required form notifying Platten of its right to challenge the summons;
  2. the IRS took thirty-five days to respond to Google’s request to send a copy of the first summons to Maxcrest, during which time the twenty-day period to challenge the summons had expired; and
  3. the IRS used U.S. Mail service to send notice to Platten in the British Virgin Islands.

Maxcrest argued that the IRS should not be able to “simply reissue an identical summons once litigation has begun and wash away all negative inferences that can be drawn from its prior deficient notice.”

Investigation as to Improper Purpose

In a separate but somewhat recent case, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that a taxpayer has a right to conduct an examination of IRS officials regarding their reasons for issuing an administrative summons when the taxpayer points to specific facts or circumstances plausibly raising an inference of bad faith. This issue has been in dispute more frequent given the procedures the IRS has adopted to enforce information document requests (IDRs), which may cause more summonses to be issued.

So the issue in Maxcrest is whether the IRS can do an end run around this prior Supreme Court case by simply re-issuing summonses once litigation has started. This would be easy enough for the IRS to do. The summons itself is nothing more than a piece of paper and issuing it only takes the IRS a few minutes. This would render most procedural challenges to IRS summonses moot.

The court appears to have recognized this. It agreed that this presents an issue of first impression that warrants further consideration. The case will be sent to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for a decision.

Call Now, We Can Help!


(713) 909-4906

Do you have a tax dispute, under audit by the IRS or state tax authorities, or just have a tax question? We want to hear from you. Call today for a free, confidential, consultation. If you are pressed for time, you can also use the contact form below to reach out to us.

Our Recent Reviews

Grga Brolih
Grga Brolih
09:20 24 Apr 17
I was a bit hesitant at first because I had not really done any research, just my friend told me about Houston Tax Attorney. Anyway i decided to give them a try and I was really impressed and pleased with the outcome of my experience. They were always very pleasant and professional and made me feel free from my tax issues. Good job!
Brown Jones
Brown Jones
08:54 10 Jun 17
Houston Tax Attorney has given me my life back. I was unable to pay my payroll taxes and in combination with the penalties attached to those taxes, my debt had begun to snowball. Houston Tax Attorney genuinely cares about their clients; they helped me throughout the process. I am extremely grateful to them.
Sandra Camacho
Sandra Camacho
03:47 27 May 17
I had a tax problem and needed help, so I went to Houston Tax Attorney. Love the team, they were so organized and communicated. Good work was done!
Turman Villanueva
Turman Villanueva
12:20 21 Apr 17
Dealing with Houston Tax Attorney was simple from the beginning to the end. Every person I spoke to was knowledgeable and helpful. I was guided in all aspects of the process and given the best advice regarding my tax condition. I have been given a second chance with the IRS. Thank you.
Bill Moore
Bill Moore
07:05 02 Jun 17
I want to Thank Houston Tax Attorney team. They took care of my IRS issues with great professionalism. No more sleepless nights. Thank you Guys!
Sharon G. Velasco
Sharon G. Velasco
08:31 24 Jun 17
I had some big tax issues and I was unable to handle it alone. Houston Tax Attorney helped me to settle all my tax problems. They were there all the way. I respect their professionalism and appreciate their commitment to their clients.
See All Reviews