New! Enter your email address to
subscribe to Everything Tax Law!

RSS/Atom Feed
Bookmark Us
Buy Legal Forms

Finding Tax Savings in a Lost Marriage: The Taxation of Alimony

If payments qualify as alimony pursuant to federal tax law, the payments may be tax deductible by the payor spouse and included in gross income to the payee spouse. If the payments do not qualify as alimony pursuant to federal tax law, the payments may not be tax deductible by the payor spouse and they may be excluded from gross income of the payee spouse.

It is very common for the IRS, on audit, to recharacterize alimony payments. For payee spouses, this often results in the IRS finding that the spouse failed to report their alimony income. For the payor spouses, this often results in the IRS disallowing tax deductions for the alimony payments. For example, in Przwoznik v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2008-50, the U.S. Tax Court found that “unallocated familiy support” was child support and not tax deductibe alimony. The U.S. Tax Court reached the opposite conclusion in Raga v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2008-46, finding that ”unallocated maintenance and child support” was alimony and therefore it had to be included in the payee spouse’s gross income.

These rules also present taxpayers with other problems for unwary taxpayers. For example, in Melvin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-115, the U.S. Tax Court concluded that transfers of property made several years in advance of the divorce that were accepted by the payee spouse in satisfaction of later alimony payments were not paid in cash and therefore did not entitle the payor spouse to a tax deduction. In Morris v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-65, the U.S. Tax Court concluded that the payor spouse was not entitled to deduct alimony payments becuase he failed to substantiate that the payments were alimony and not child support.

With advance tax planning, these problems may have been avoided. This type of tax planning may allow the separating and divorcing spouses to recognize significant federal income tax savings. Separating and divorcing spouses should be aware of what payments do not qualify as alimony for purposes of federal tax law.  Generally, payments do not qualify as alimony for purposes of federal tax law if:

  • the payments are not made pursuant to a divorce decree or separation agreement,
  • the spouses are married and file a joint tax return (married copules who file a joint tax return may qualify for innocent spouse relief),
  • the spouses are members of the same household at the time the payments are made,
  • the divorce decree or separation agreement designates the payments as non-alimony,
  • there is an obligation to continue the payments after the death of the payee spouse (either in the decree or agreement or in state law),
  • the payments consist of property rather than money,
  • the payments call for significantly larger payments in the first three years following separation or divorce,
  • the payments are for the payee spouse’s bills (such as mortgage payments and real estate taxes), and
  • the payments are child support.

Ideally, one or both of the separating or divorcing spouses will consider these rules. Also, spouses should ensure that their divorce decrees or separation agreements are written in a way that addresses these rules. As with other major financial transactions, taxpayers should consult with their tax counsel if they have any doubt about the taxation of their alimony or other payments.

Share and Enjoy:

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Technorati

Related Posts:

  • Tax and Divorce Planning
  • Hiring A Tax Attorney to Abate A Tax Penalty
  • Colorado Tax Attorney Contests IRS Bypass Letter
  • IRS Attorney Shows Up for Court, But That Is About All He Does
  • To Be a Tax Controversy Attorney….

    Popular Posts:


  • Comments are closed.

    colorado tax attorney | sitemap | terms | resources | attorneys | tax preparers | directory | contact us | login
    © 2005-present all rights reserved


    Not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

    www.technologytax.com

    Colorado:Arvada Aspen Aurora Avon Bayfield Basalt Berthoud Black Hawk Boulder Breckenridge Brighton Broomfield Brush Burlington Castle Rock Cedaredge Centennial Cherry Hills Village Colorado Springs Commerce City Cortez Craig Creede Cripple Creek Delta Denver Dillon Durango Eagle Eaton Edgewater Englewood Erie Estes Park Evans Federal Heights Firestone Frederick Fort Collins Fort Lupton Fort Morgan Fountain Frisco Fruita Georgetown Glendale Glenwood Springs Golden Grand Junction Greeley Greenwood Village Gunnison Gypsum Idaho Springs Ignacio Johnstown La Junta Lafayette Lakewood Lamar Larkspur Limon Littleton Lone Tree Longmont Louisville Loveland Lyons Minturn Montrose Monument Morrison Nederland New Castle Northglenn Olathe Pagosa Springs Palmer Lake Parker Pueblo Rifle Sheridan Silt Silverthorne Silverton Town of Snowmass Village South Fork Steamboat Springs Sterling Stratton Superior Telluride Timnath Thornton Trinidad Vail Westminster Wheat Ridge Windsor Winter Park Woodland Park